A collection of ten shorts, which are hit or miss for me, there's some classics and some that you'll forget just after watching. The classics being Casey at bat, Peter and the Wolf, The Whale that wanted to sing at the MET and Johnnie Fedora and Alice Bluebonnet. The others are just to me kinda glorified Silly Symphonies added in to give the movie in between the bigger stories a little meat. Again we're at the odd point in the studios history the films were actually called "Packaged Films" because of their containing all short stories. The four "Package Films" being Make Mine Music, Fun And Fancy Free, Melody Time, and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad. Again this was because of the war which left the studios with a number of unfinished works and ideas that were too long to be considered shorts and too short to be considered features. Digging into the history, the first short Blue Bayou was actually originally intended for a Claire De Lune sequence of Fantasia but was cut out of the feature and re purposed and originally there was an eleventh cartoon "The Martins and the McCoys" , a version of the Hatfields and McCoys, which was deemed to violent for modern audiences when it was released on home video due to guns and people being shot so it was edited out of the film.
Believe it or not there are parts of this that have made it into the parks. Casey at bat has ties into Casey's Corner at the Magic Kingdom and also if you wander the Philharmagic queue you'll find a poster advertising Willie the whale, also didn't mention it last post you'll find The Three Caballeros poster in the queue as well. So it goes to show that even the smallest of cartoons can be found around the resort.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Saludos Amigos / The Three Caballeros
For you park goers 'The Three Caballeros' has been getting more and more presence in the parks over the years. They are centrally located in the pool at All-Star Music, Panchito has his own gift shop at Coronado Springs, and they are also the stars of the re-imagined Mexico Pavilion boat ride now named "Grand Fiesta Tour". You'll often find them many times in topiary form by Mexico or during Flower and Garden Festival and Donald now has a well themed meet and greet next to the Mexico Pavilion. I must say they were well incorporated into the boat ride, its hard to think back to the old ride and not hearing the theme song and music playing in the background. You know one thing I've noticed since I started on this little pet project with Disney Animation is that the films really are important to WDW, so far every film in some way has a tie into Walt Disney World, and again its the animation, not the live action movies that play the part. Also since I've started watching, I have noticed that I catch my self paying more attention to detail in the parks and really piecing together how epic Disney is as a whole and how much of its history as a company plays a role still today.
Bambi
Your gonna be hard pressed to find many references to this film at all in Walt Disney World. Outside of some topiaries here and there and a presence at Epcot's International Flower and Garden Festival, there's not alot of love for Bambi in the parks. I did hear rumors that this years Flower and Garden Festival will feature "Bambi's Butterfly House", replacing the usual one over towards Test Track, this one would be larger and located on the pathways to Imagination pavilion. You do have to wonder why the Bambi characters aren't worked into the parks a little more. I feel there's some missed opportunities, especially at like Rafiki's Planet Watch, Fort Wilderness, and even Wilderness Lodge. When you think about it though, outside of doing some topiaries and murals, its a little harder to work in a film like this, especially when you can't really bring the characters to life for like Meet/Greets, I do think Disney has the technology now with projection systems and other technologies that could be used to bring them to life by other means than as a topiary. If you look smaller though you'll Bambi and Thumper like to grace alot of pins, especially any related to spring or seasons change. Also what better characters to base plush toys on then animals, you'll see many a child in the parks toting a Bambi or Thumper around, for some reason I guess carrying a skunk around doesn't seem to go over to big (sorry, Flower).
Monday, January 17, 2011
Dumbo
Anyways as the ringmaster might say "on with the show", even though it has a lot of bad rap going around, it remains one of the Disney classics and features probably the most beloved of the classic characters and that's Dumbo himself. So many people love Dumbo and if you don't believe that look at his ride at the Magic Kingdom, guaranteed your not getting to fly and elephant in under 30 minutes. It's either lots of kids watch this movie and love the character and film or they just want the chance to control the ride. I'm going with the first one, because now with Aladdin's Magic Carpets and Triceratops spin they have more control over the vehicles, yet they still line up for Dumbo. It's also one of those rights of passage rides that is passed down from parents to kids, the parents rode it when they were little and remember that feeling of flying Dumbo and pass it onto their young ones. With all this dedication to riding Dumbo it only makes sense Disney would want to jump at the chance to expand on the franchise and with the Fantasyland
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Fantasia
You can tell there's been a change in audiences that watch Disney animated films, because this was clearly aimed at adults as many kids would of probably been bored sitting through two hours of classical music. When you think it's only one of two Feature Animation to have a sequel that was a theatrical release and not straight to DVD, 'Fantasia 2000', the only other being 'The Rescuers' and 'The Rescuers: Down Under' says alot about the strength the film had. Look at any Imagineer's name tag and see what the icon for an Imagineer is and lets not forget also how many Disney buildings sport the Sorcerer's Hat into their design world wide, from the animation building in California to a show building in Disneyland Paris.
Need we also forget that it just also was the inspiration for the film 'The Sorcerer's Apprentice', complete with recreation of the title sequence from the animated film.
Then you can even get into all the actual merchandise that they sell in the parks from recreations of the Sorcerer's hat to even t-shirts resembling Sorcerer Apprentice Mickey's robe.
Those are all reasons why I put this film above it's status as just one of the 50 animated Walt Disney Feature Animation films. A movie with so much pull I feel deserves its own plateau to stand on, because this is truly the icon and image of all that is Walt Disney and Disney in general and never has one single Disney character had so much of a presence than Sorcerer Apprentice Mickey.
Pinocchio
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
Friday, January 14, 2011
The Many Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh
Now for the Walt Disney World aspect of Pooh. After seeing the movie, I have to say the ride at the Magic Kingdom really does do a great job of placing you in those specific scenes from the movie. Because, half way through the movie, I leaned over to the wife and asked if she wanted to go to the park so I can go on the ride. I haven't been there to really see the new queue since it opened, except at night where it's hard to see everything, but, really anxious to see how everything looks and how well it fits to the movie as well. I think for as small a ride as it is, getting each of those scenes into it and really capturing the feel and the music of those scenes and the selection of what they used to represent the scenes was really done well, you can tell they did their research. I liked the ride before but after seeing the movie now, I have a new appreciation for the ride and I think when I go on it again will be a little more meaningful than just a Fantasyland dark ride. I used to think the big story book pages at the ride where kinda dump like a cheap way out of theming, well until now when they redid most of it, but after seeing this again and how much those pages played a role in the movie, I can see why they chose to have you intertwined with these giant pages out of the book of Pooh.
Like I said I can't wait to see the new movie now, I hope they change the release date or at least be ready to be clobbered. I'm not sure how the new one will do, most of the kids are used to the CGI Pooh on Disney Channel, I'm interested to see how they will take a liking to the classic hand drawn Pooh and if we will see CGI Pooh again or are we gonna really try and being back classic Pooh. I haven't seen any of the CGI movies so to say I don't like them or how they look in CGI wouldn't be fair, I think that's a movie and a blog for another day. Also I don't know when the DVD came out, but, the one I got from Netflix was the Friendship edition and it had a really good extra about the story of Pooh and how the author created the story and the characters, how Walt even years and years before talked about doing Pooh and an interview with how the Sherman brothers came up with the music. When I get to it in the list of watching order, I'll have to buy it in whatever edition it is in now, but a nice way to start of the Disney movie-a-thon.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
There is only one Disney
Recently I've been torn as to whether to keep this blog going or to shift my focus to Walt Disney World and my photography hobby there. I've come to a good marriage between Disney and Movies. I'm now setting out to rediscover Disney through it's film history and to start with what started it all the famous animated films. I am planning to re-watch all the Disney animated features chronologically from Snow White to Tangles. On the way I'll also be adding to my Disney library, because if I don't have it and its not locked up in the vault...pause for gripe....DANG GONE STUPID VAULT........I will purchase it and add it in. At the same time it will give me a unique ability on the blog here and that's give my opinion here at my present age, on these movies, many of which I have not seen in quite some time. Then with the little guy coming along I'll be able to re-watch them once again and blog about his first experiences watching these classic stories. Of course I'll throw in some newer movies to break it up so I don't get too burnt out on cartoons. Then after the cartoons I may venture into the realm of the live action movies. The cartoons will also be able to enhance my experiences of the parks, cause the characters and stories will be refreshed to me and I can look for my ties between the movies and the parks. Why you might ask did I come up with this crazy idea, well I think there's no better way to appreciate WDW than to see where the inspiration for so many of the rides and movies came from and that's its animated stories and characters. With out these movies there would be no Cindererlla's Castle, no Fantasyland, no Festival of the Lion King and no Characters in the parks. It will also be interesting after seeing the newest film Tangled in 3D and comparing it to the classic films and seeing how Disney Animation has changed and progressed over the years. The other thing I had to debate was when the time comes to I include Pixar films into the chronology of things and I have to say yes a few years ago maybe not, but, now I think Disney-Pixar have become so intertwined it's hard not to have one with out the other.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Season Of The Witch
Last night I decided on seeing a movie in theaters, needed a break from work and painting the soon to be baby's room. Season of the Witch I really didn't know too much going into seeing it other than a trailer once or twice. The movie starts off with a back story of a hanging of three witches, one of whom escapes and even though its not out right told seems to be the main character in the rest of the movie.
The main characters of the film are Behmen (Nicholas Cage) and Felson (Ron Perlman) who have been fighting through battles in the Crusades side by side for years. Speaking of Crusades that sets our time from around 1338 and after being tired of killing innocent women and children in the name of the church, Behmen and Felson desert the Crusades and are discovered in a town nearby suffering from the Black Plague. To keep from being killed by the towns high priest who's dying of the plague he offers them the chance to escort a captive woman being held for being a witch and creating the black plague.
Story follows the two plus Debelzaq (a priest), Eckhart (knight), Hagamar (guide), and Kay (an altar boy who's out to be a knight). It's basically a shortened epic, main idea get from point 'A' to point 'B' alive, with some obstacles being thrown in the way. The obstacles in this instance referring to the witch trying to kill off her captors and escape. When they finally get to their destination they find their witch has purposely lead them there to destroy the very book they seek to use to kill her. Long story short, they learn she's not a witch at all that they have to contend with but a girl possessed by a demon. Can't really talk to much of the I guess you can call them "battles" or encounters with the witch because they try to pull off a little Hitchcock/6th Sense twist, that kinda gets pulled off but was a little to obvious it was coming.
Really simple plot, good movie though and some really nicely done CGI work, the thing that will ruin it all though is the ending is just bad and poorly done. What's the worst part is this is one of those your like, come on they make every movie 20 minutes too long except this one that could use that time. As far as actors go, I'm sorry to Nic and Ron but I think anyone could of pulled these characters off. This movie was good, but had sooo much more potential to be great, it's some where between Syfy channel and blockbuster. Leads me to my last opinion and that it got a little preachy in some areas about the debate over church and god and beliefs. But, I enjoyed it because A) It took place during a time period I love and B) It dealt with witchcraft.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Winter's Bone
This was a movie I had never heard of or even would of seen had I watched the trailer. I chose to watch this because Entertainment Weekly named it one of the top movies to watch before Oscar night. After watching it I have to say I can see why it would be on that list.
The movie is set up in the Ozarks and is centered around a teen girl named Ree Dolly (Jennifer Lawrence), who has a younger brother, younger sister and a sick mother. Her father is a deadbeat drug-dealer that has a court date pending and has set up their house and land for bail. Unfortunately that court date is about to happen and noone know the whereabouts of Ree's father or do they but just won't tell. It's all about Ree following a trail through these deadbeat friends and relatives, in the middle of nowhere to find her father and save their property. While she's off on this social quest, she also has to take care of her kid brother and sisters and check in on her mother.
I do have this to say about the movie over the storyline, the cinematography was really well done, it really brings out the colors and look of this poor middle-of-nowhere, backwoods area in the middle of winter. There are times though in the story I did get a little lost as to who's who and what's their relationship in all this. Not a long movie as one would think for being an Oscar contender, clocking in at just around one hour and forty minutes. It's hard though to not talk to much about the overall story in this film without giving too much of the plot. The movie does get a little dark at certain times, but never anything too dark to distract from the drama of it all and theres times you'll feel a little banjo playing from 'Deliverance' would fit in. Definitely worth a rental one night when you want to sit down and see a movie, not for laughs or action but to watch a story being told.
Entertainment Weekly has it as one of their ideas for Oscar nominations in the following categories, Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Actress. I would agree with them for every nomination, the only one that I think may win is the Best Actress, Jennifer Lawrence did a phenomenal job in the film. Although I do have the novel it was based, on hold at the library so I'll see how it compares to the movie. If the other Oscar contenders are anything as good it may be a good race to the finish this year, now just to watch the others :).
The movie is set up in the Ozarks and is centered around a teen girl named Ree Dolly (Jennifer Lawrence), who has a younger brother, younger sister and a sick mother. Her father is a deadbeat drug-dealer that has a court date pending and has set up their house and land for bail. Unfortunately that court date is about to happen and noone know the whereabouts of Ree's father or do they but just won't tell. It's all about Ree following a trail through these deadbeat friends and relatives, in the middle of nowhere to find her father and save their property. While she's off on this social quest, she also has to take care of her kid brother and sisters and check in on her mother.
I do have this to say about the movie over the storyline, the cinematography was really well done, it really brings out the colors and look of this poor middle-of-nowhere, backwoods area in the middle of winter. There are times though in the story I did get a little lost as to who's who and what's their relationship in all this. Not a long movie as one would think for being an Oscar contender, clocking in at just around one hour and forty minutes. It's hard though to not talk to much about the overall story in this film without giving too much of the plot. The movie does get a little dark at certain times, but never anything too dark to distract from the drama of it all and theres times you'll feel a little banjo playing from 'Deliverance' would fit in. Definitely worth a rental one night when you want to sit down and see a movie, not for laughs or action but to watch a story being told.
Entertainment Weekly has it as one of their ideas for Oscar nominations in the following categories, Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Actress. I would agree with them for every nomination, the only one that I think may win is the Best Actress, Jennifer Lawrence did a phenomenal job in the film. Although I do have the novel it was based, on hold at the library so I'll see how it compares to the movie. If the other Oscar contenders are anything as good it may be a good race to the finish this year, now just to watch the others :).
Sex And The City 2
The four women are back Carrie (Sarah Jessica Parker), Samantha (Kim Cattrall), Charlotte (Kristen Davis) and Miranda (Cynthia Nixon). This sequel takes place after the events of the first movie 'Sex and the City' from 2008. Movie starts off bringing everyone up to speed on where these women have been for the past two years and their relationships. The big bring the gals together plot is their gay friends wedding and I'm sorry if you watch this, please tell me why Liza Minnelli sings "Single Ladies" and two why she sings it at a gay wedding where most of the guests are men.
Samantha gets invited by a Sheik to the United Arab Emirates city of Abu Dhabi, all expenses paid on his behalf in the hopes she will run a PR campaign for him. Most of the movie takes place here and most of it revolves around how these four women aren't into the women being second to a man rules of the country. This movie should really be called Sex and the City: Samantha's Adventure. Samantha is the main character in this movie once they leave New York, in New York it's all Carrie, in the Middle East its Samantha's show. She's constantly oogling the boys, walking the fine line of showing too much skin, and pushing the buttons of by-standers with her public displays of affection with the men she meets.
The first movie was pretty decent, not a fan of the HBO series or the books (a little to chicky for my tastes), alas the first one was alright. It had a decent story, from what I know carried the series into a movie format pretty well. The problem I have is, it's called Sex and the City, yet both movies you spend more time in other countries that in New York. Okay, Okay I guess the first one Mexico kind of worked because it was suppose to be the Honeymoon that never happened, turned into a vacation. But, why the Middle East and what a lousy excuse to go there and a bad Hollywood showing of what life is actually like over there. It seems they struggled a lot to come up with a plan to make a second movie work. To me it should of ended with the first movie, it did well in theaters and gave the fans of the series a movie. This one tanked in the box office and did not get rave reviews, at some point Hollywood needs to realize just cause there's a fan base doesn't always mean that they will pay to see what ever gets made with the material they flock over.
Plus the movie clocks in at a whopping almost two hours and forty minutes, way longer than it should be. It could of easy ended at the two hour mark. Lots of scenes from the final act of the movie were pointless and to me just there to stretch the movie out. But, depicting UAE was bad, I mean come on having four ladies sing karaoke to "I am a woman", really, to me all this movie did was push the political correctness of needed women's rights in UAE.
Samantha gets invited by a Sheik to the United Arab Emirates city of Abu Dhabi, all expenses paid on his behalf in the hopes she will run a PR campaign for him. Most of the movie takes place here and most of it revolves around how these four women aren't into the women being second to a man rules of the country. This movie should really be called Sex and the City: Samantha's Adventure. Samantha is the main character in this movie once they leave New York, in New York it's all Carrie, in the Middle East its Samantha's show. She's constantly oogling the boys, walking the fine line of showing too much skin, and pushing the buttons of by-standers with her public displays of affection with the men she meets.
The first movie was pretty decent, not a fan of the HBO series or the books (a little to chicky for my tastes), alas the first one was alright. It had a decent story, from what I know carried the series into a movie format pretty well. The problem I have is, it's called Sex and the City, yet both movies you spend more time in other countries that in New York. Okay, Okay I guess the first one Mexico kind of worked because it was suppose to be the Honeymoon that never happened, turned into a vacation. But, why the Middle East and what a lousy excuse to go there and a bad Hollywood showing of what life is actually like over there. It seems they struggled a lot to come up with a plan to make a second movie work. To me it should of ended with the first movie, it did well in theaters and gave the fans of the series a movie. This one tanked in the box office and did not get rave reviews, at some point Hollywood needs to realize just cause there's a fan base doesn't always mean that they will pay to see what ever gets made with the material they flock over.
Plus the movie clocks in at a whopping almost two hours and forty minutes, way longer than it should be. It could of easy ended at the two hour mark. Lots of scenes from the final act of the movie were pointless and to me just there to stretch the movie out. But, depicting UAE was bad, I mean come on having four ladies sing karaoke to "I am a woman", really, to me all this movie did was push the political correctness of needed women's rights in UAE.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
the://craigslist.killer
Tonight on Lifetime was a made for tv movie based on the real story of The Craigslist Killer. It was actually a pretty good movie for being a lifetime film. The sad thing is I really don't ever remember hearing about this story or this guy. Then again I don't really watch the news, so I'm sure someone probably remembers seeing the real news stories.
Philip Markoff (Jake McDorman) is a top of his class medical school student engaged to Megan McAllister (Agnes Bruckner). The movie depicts their life and building their relationship bond, but, also at the same time showing there maybe some more deep down in Philips past. Philip has some deep dark secrets he's been able to hide from his wife, he likes to meet women from Craigslist that advertise for erotic services and tie them up, humiliate them and rob them in hotel rooms. On top of that he also has gambling problems and anger issues. He's been able to hide all this and get away with it until one of his hotel meetings goes wrong and ends up killing the girl he is only suppose to be robbing.
William Baldwin plays Detective Bennett who is tasked with finding this so called Craigslist killer, the only lead he has to go on are fuzzy pictures of average Joe in Boston. The break he needs to link Philip to the crimes comes when Digital Forensics is able to pull a real name and IP address from the Craigslist name used to meet these girls. After being under surviellance and attempting to leave the Boston area, he is arrested and booked into jail. His fiance Megan can't believe what is happening, how can this happen to a straight-A popular med school student. She fights for him and helps him plea his not guility that they obviously have the wrong man.
When the detectives search their aparment and find a hidden 9mm, handcuffs, ducktape and sixteen pairs of panties hidden under the bed, they find their evidence and she finally finds that she has to admit that he is who they say he is, a mentally disturbed killer. Having finally come to terms she visits him at jail and confronts him and finally calls off the engagement and leaves him. One year after their wedding should of took place, Philip successfully commits suicide in his jail cell. That's the story pretty quick and dirty, don't want to spoil everything in case this movie hits dvd or you want to look it up on Lifetime and catch a re-running of it.
After doing some digging i'm really surprised at how closely this movie actually followed the real events that took place from 2009 - 2010. You can read about the real Philip Markoff on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Markoff and Boston Fox's website http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/report%3A-'craigslist-killer'-philip-markoff-commits-suicide-in-jail. There's a couple more based on real event movies coming to Lifetime in the next few weeks that were previews during this one that look pretty good and after seeing how well this one was actually done I may just have to put them onto the DVR to watch.
Philip Markoff (Jake McDorman) is a top of his class medical school student engaged to Megan McAllister (Agnes Bruckner). The movie depicts their life and building their relationship bond, but, also at the same time showing there maybe some more deep down in Philips past. Philip has some deep dark secrets he's been able to hide from his wife, he likes to meet women from Craigslist that advertise for erotic services and tie them up, humiliate them and rob them in hotel rooms. On top of that he also has gambling problems and anger issues. He's been able to hide all this and get away with it until one of his hotel meetings goes wrong and ends up killing the girl he is only suppose to be robbing.
William Baldwin plays Detective Bennett who is tasked with finding this so called Craigslist killer, the only lead he has to go on are fuzzy pictures of average Joe in Boston. The break he needs to link Philip to the crimes comes when Digital Forensics is able to pull a real name and IP address from the Craigslist name used to meet these girls. After being under surviellance and attempting to leave the Boston area, he is arrested and booked into jail. His fiance Megan can't believe what is happening, how can this happen to a straight-A popular med school student. She fights for him and helps him plea his not guility that they obviously have the wrong man.
When the detectives search their aparment and find a hidden 9mm, handcuffs, ducktape and sixteen pairs of panties hidden under the bed, they find their evidence and she finally finds that she has to admit that he is who they say he is, a mentally disturbed killer. Having finally come to terms she visits him at jail and confronts him and finally calls off the engagement and leaves him. One year after their wedding should of took place, Philip successfully commits suicide in his jail cell. That's the story pretty quick and dirty, don't want to spoil everything in case this movie hits dvd or you want to look it up on Lifetime and catch a re-running of it.
After doing some digging i'm really surprised at how closely this movie actually followed the real events that took place from 2009 - 2010. You can read about the real Philip Markoff on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Markoff and Boston Fox's website http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/report%3A-'craigslist-killer'-philip-markoff-commits-suicide-in-jail. There's a couple more based on real event movies coming to Lifetime in the next few weeks that were previews during this one that look pretty good and after seeing how well this one was actually done I may just have to put them onto the DVR to watch.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Avalon High
The idea of the movie being all about Medieval Europe is implanted from the beginning, the movie is centered around Allie Pennington (Brittany Robertson) who's parents are both Medieval literature professors and have just moved and taken a contract at a local University. Allie goes to Avalon High and is immediately wooed by the football jock of the school Will Wagner (Gregg Sulkin) and at the same time finds a fancy in a brainiac named Miles (Joey Pollari). All three have the same European History class taught by Mr. Moore (Steve Valentine) and Allie just happens to arrive at Avalon High when he is teaching the Arthur legend and just happens to be using a text book about Arthur written by her parents. Also in this class is Will's girlfriend, Jen (Molly C. Quinn), his best friend Lance (Christopher Tavarez) and school bully Marco (Devon Graye).
So, to cut the story down short and to the point and not having to go over the whole drama end of the movie I'll keep it to the main Medieval premise. Allie and Miles have been given a research paper on The Order Of The Bear, they'll come to find out it was a secret order that believed Arthur will one day return reincarnated. Everything they uncover leads them to believe that Arthur will return the night of the big football game. They suspect that Will is actually the reincarnated Arthur and he'll lead the football team to victory, and when they find Jen cheating with Lance, well there's your Guinevere and Lancelot characters. Also Miles now seems to be getting headaches which leads to visions of things to come making him into a bit or a psychic or could is he really Merlin, then you have Marco who wants nothing more than to see Will blow the whole game, making him Mordred out to kill King Arthur. All through the movie you have Allie and Miles trying to convince everyone including their teacher that Arthur is actually coming back to Earth on the night of the big football game at Avalon High.
Finally at the end we get our big show down in the school theater where they just happen to have a set made for Julius Caesar that gives the period look and the handy placement of a sword (Excalibur) for Arthur to use. Except, Will is not Arthur....Since no one will probably watch this, if you want to stop reading because I'm going to spoil the ending.......Allie turns out to be King Arthur and her teacher Mr. Moore is actually Mordred. I know, how and why did Arthur come back as a girl is beyond me as well. This whole group of kids and their teacher are magically transported to a European landscape and battle it out and at the end, bam, back to present day just as security walks in to take Moore away. Like I said there's some stretches in the movie to be sure and most of it just felt like a teen high school chick flick making use of the Arthurian legend as a metaphor for what happens at the school, and using the medieval theme as a way to attract some boys to the movie. In case that didn't get the teenage boys attention Director Stuart Gillard decided to throw in some jogging shots of Allies butt and chest that were very obvious why they were there (totally not needed scenes). A final technical note this movie has some bad sound editing and whenever there seems to be any kind of background noise or music the actors volume drops and then when the background noise ends their voices go back up. Final summary, not Disney Channel's best movie by a long shot, but, it's still watchable and you won't feel the urge like some other bad TV movies to turn it off.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Shrek Forever After
(Updated 01/02/11) Well today starts off the year long movie celebration, too bad it started with a movie under par. 'Shrek Forever' After aka 'Shrek: The Final Chapter', after watching it I'm glad it is the final Shrek movie. Actually they should of ended on the third movie and it would of been a good ending for Shrek. This installment just felt really stretched thin for story and new ways to tell old jokes.
The movie starts off with a flash back to the original story and a side story to it, where the king and queen are going to pay off Rumpelstiltskin to break Fiona's curse, until they get wind of Fiona being rescued from the tower. After that it's back to the present, where the third movie left off, Shrek, Fiona, and the three babies are getting into an everyday routine. Everyday routine is not what Shrek wants though as he secretly yearns to go back to the old ways when he was a mean ogre and could do what ever he pleased. Keeping this longing inside and with the repetition of normal life, finally leads him basically into a mid-life crisis moment. Still wanting to rule the whole kingdom, Rumpelstiltskin has been looking for his big break, when he over hears Shrek and Fiona arguing. Hatching his plan he plays on Shreks needs, and offers him one day as a real ogre for one day of his childhood (Yes, its referred to as 'Give a day, Get a Day can't help feeling they based that on Disney). What Shrek doesn't know is that Rumple decides to take the day Shrek is born, hence Shrek never being born he never met his friends or Fiona and at the end of the day will cease to exist. Giving room for the main plot of the movie (Set in a alternate reality), to undo the deal with Rumple (Find True Love's Kiss) that being getting his old friends to trust him and winning Fiona's love all over again and that being made harder now that in this alternate dimension Fiona was never rescued from the tower and is the leader of an Ogre rebellion to overthrow Rumplestiltskin. Along the way to getting all these tasks done Shrek learns that he really did have it made and had a good life and what was he thinking wanting to give it all up.
Now the big question is...will this actually be the final Shrek movie or will Dreamworks give into box office takes and green light a fifth movie. I sure hope not, I like Shrek and all, but, this one really showed how there's not much left to go story wise. Of course though, you know the kids will love it, with Shreks burp and fart sense of humor, and being an animated movie. I just think with so much animation being produced now, not like when Shrek first started being new to CGI, that now story lines are going to have to surpass not just the animation. Also on a side note in case any Universal execs ever read this...update Shrek 4-D in the parks, it bridges the gap between movies 1 and 2, the fourth movie came and went, so I think the show is a little outdated now. There was a neat little extra on the Blu-Ray I enjoyed. that showed how technology has advanced over the last decade since the original Shrek movie and comparing similar scenes from them to now. Still the extras on the disc weren't as good as the ones Disney usually includes with their animated films on dvd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)